![]()
on Big Sur they moved third party kernel extensions to userland ones. #Twain sane big sur update#> Why does Apple get the Professional OS nod when EVERY update is a break in your workflow Majorly.īecause every update usually also moves things forward. As a bonus it means you can network SANE, just by adding an RPC layer, whereas for TWAIN you'd need like RDP or something. #Twain sane big sur software#So in TWAIN there is no API for like "Scan A4 document, 300dpi" only "Make whatever Twain GUI I have appear" and when you buy a scanner it just comes with a CD (I guess these days they tell you to download it probably? I have not set up a new scanner in decades) with the software on it.īut SANE does what people assumed TWAIN did, the GUI application software is neutral, and the code for driving scanners has APIs for scanning documents, because that makes more sense (and also, frankly, "reverse engineering USB code" and "building easy to use GUIs" are not the same skill set). #Twain sane big sur driver#There is no actual scanner technology in TWAIN, each scanner comes with its own GUI plus scanner driver bolted into one app. TWAIN (sometimes said to mean "Toolkit Without An Interesting Name") looks like it's a universal API for scanners, except, the mandatory parts just spin up a graphical user interface and that does all the actual work. SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) is named that way because it does what people on minority platforms assumed TWAIN does on Windows / MacOS. Now, who feels comfortable shipping that to users knowing if your finished driver didn't catch every edge case you might destroy their scanner? Somebody reverse engineering a driver sends "Move scan head" and, to their astonishment, it falls off its rail and their scanner is broken. SANE (the Free Software document scanner software) has run into cases where it's just cheaper to have code that checks "Is this the end of the bed? If so, turn off the motor" than spend five cents on a limit switch or one cent adding a stop so that the scan head physically can't fall off. the Therac-25 incident as an example of why software control isn't enough - but well, check out how many HN regulars are proud that they either didn't pay any attention in class or never attended and are "self-taught". We do teach Computer Science / Software Engineering students not to do this, showing them e.g. Obviously you could design this sensibly so that no legal inputs result in malfunction let alone damage, but that might cost more, so, do it all in software right? And then you're at the mercy of the software and anything (such as the OS kernel) which that software depends on. That market used to be squarely owned by Ableton on Mac, but the latter has recently fallen out of favor over plugin compatibility issues with newer effect VSTs.įor broadcast, meaning TV shows and live sports streaming, I heard that BBC and the likes are using LAWO which are custom integrated hardware+software solutions capable of loading Linux VST plugins.Īs I understand it the Kontrol S4 has moving parts (essentially motors) under USB control. They also have many features for live shows and / or DJing. Both are popular on Linux:īitWig especially fits in with the hacker spirit because you can modify and script almost everything. Their cheaper variant Cubase is popular for audiobook production.įor music production, BitWig and REAPER are currently the rising stars. For example, I know for sure that Expendables 3 was mastered this way.įor classical music and bluray mastering, I hear the most from Nuendo users on Windows. #Twain sane big sur pro#My impression is that most Hollywood work is now done with Pro Tools on Windows. #Twain sane big sur movie#In short, professional movie studios have voted with their money, and now the market follows suit by canceling Mac support. I'm sure Apple will spin this as "the app store provides", but there's only so much work you can put in for a platform with a median lifetime app revenue of <$1000. This is what happens if you don't value the time of your third party developers, for example with useless updates and poor documentation. We still snort out OSX binaries from an old 10.9 xcode, but those aren't notarized because no paying customer has asked for it yet. In my case, Windows and Linux are now paying for feature development. The fact is that any professional customer that uses NI has jumped ship years ago, so for Native Instruments the Mac market is shrinking in revenue, while growing in costs. We saw the writing on the wall around OS X 10.11 when major studios asked us to support Linux and subsequently bought $40k Linux-based mixing desks. I also have a personal stake in this, because I used to sell pro audio software, including things that integrate with Pro Tools and OS X. is practically the same announcement by Avid Pro Tools, which is the standard for Hollywood movie production. What this shows you is that it has become financially unviable for pro audio companies to support Apple. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |